<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Check If A Image Is Fake Or Real</title> <atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html</link> <description>Know your technology head on</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: dragonlordwarlock</title><link>http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html/comment-page-1#comment-39262</link> <dc:creator>dragonlordwarlock</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:42:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html#comment-39262</guid> <description>I tried using the software but while it might detect if the image was saved from a photo editor, it does not really tell if a document is real or faked. For example I sometimes scan documents using photoshop and this program will tell me that it might be fake but they are not... yes I tried it. So reading the EXIF with this program is therefore an unreliable method for most images and only valid for a limited set of originals from selected set of cameras. I checked a few taken with my digital camera and it could not tell me if it was original or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried using the software but while it might detect if the image was saved from a photo editor, it does not really tell if a document is real or faked. For example I sometimes scan documents using photoshop and this program will tell me that it might be fake but they are not&#8230; yes I tried it. So reading the EXIF with this program is therefore an unreliable method for most images and only valid for a limited set of originals from selected set of cameras. I checked a few taken with my digital camera and it could not tell me if it was original or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              11546
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 5/14 queries in 0.022 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn4.techie-buzz.com

Served from: www.techie-buzz.com @ 2012-02-10 06:16:36 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk: enhanced
Cache key:          image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html/feed/_index.xml_gzip
Caching:            enabled
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.206s
Header info:
X-Pingback:         http://techie-buzz.com/xmlrpc.php
Set-Cookie:         PHPSESSID=tthbs4aobqhsctm3ad159ml2o5; path=/
Link:               <http://wp.me/p4tVd-ZN>; rel=shortlink
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
Last-Modified:      Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:16:36 GMT
Vary:               Accept-Encoding, Cookie
Expires:            Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:26:36 GMT
Pragma:             public
Cache-Control:      max-age=600, public, must-revalidate, proxy-revalidate
Etag:               30b69ef6e212640a94856f1fbd030f00
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.9.2.4
Content-Encoding:   gzip
-->
