<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check If A Image Is Fake Or Real</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html?utm_source=subscriber&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:50:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
		<item>
		<title>By: dragonlordwarlock</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html#comment-39262</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonlordwarlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/image-tools/check-if-a-image-is-fake-or-real.html#comment-39262</guid>
		<description>I tried using the software but while it might detect if the image was saved from a photo editor, it does not really tell if a document is real or faked. For example I sometimes scan documents using photoshop and this program will tell me that it might be fake but they are not... yes I tried it. So reading the EXIF with this program is therefore an unreliable method for most images and only valid for a limited set of originals from selected set of cameras. I checked a few taken with my digital camera and it could not tell me if it was original or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried using the software but while it might detect if the image was saved from a photo editor, it does not really tell if a document is real or faked. For example I sometimes scan documents using photoshop and this program will tell me that it might be fake but they are not&#8230; yes I tried it. So reading the EXIF with this program is therefore an unreliable method for most images and only valid for a limited set of originals from selected set of cameras. I checked a few taken with my digital camera and it could not tell me if it was original or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.344 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-22 08:24:50 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->