<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you blog for search engines?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/google/should-you-blog-for-search-engines.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/google/should-you-blog-for-search-engines.html</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roy Van Rivero</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/google/should-you-blog-for-search-engines.html#comment-2749</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Van Rivero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/google/should-you-blog-for-search-engines.html#comment-2749</guid>
		<description>Good day!

The information posted in your blog about the traffic enjoyed by several websites (not because of the quality of their articles published but because there remarkable traffic hits are just a product of being anchored to giant search engines) is not new to my analysis of the trend of generating website traffic. I have thought that before. And now, I have proven that I am not alone that is aware of this fact- your vigilance (thru your blogs) supplements my idea that it is really possible to drive website traffic without so much effort (as what you've said) on building quality-centered articles. Though, I am not that knowledgeable to visualize how did you conceptualize and eventually found a strategic analysis in tracking the performance of these websites (based on traffic hits), I am still convinced on the emergence of this fact.    

Well, it is significant to note, however, that all around in the net are for business. We must not disclose this reality. We must be aware that the primary goal of these website is just ' how to make money' without enough effort (ideal article writing). We are aware that in business, everyone, as much as possible, thinks how to maximize profit within the scope of reasonable cost (Maximization of profit, minimization of cost).

And though, this kind of trend continues to soar in the cyber world ( where significant traffic is accumulated by keywords and terms) I think, it is unreasonable for you to be threatened by this (if that is what you feel) because you have said (In the idea of beating the established site on keywords and terms): Yes you can, as a part of the research I did, I posted new articles to match those keywords and though I landed on page 1 of search engines, it took me at least 3-4 days before I could rank higher than them. See? You were able to make your site on the higher rank. Therefore, you are in the right track on how to drive website traffic in the most ideal way that every site should exercise. There is no significant reason to be worried about. As long as your site is making you and your company grows with the system you are in, then this exercise must be continued.


I think we can not claim that the common practices of these websites are illegal or something that can cause problem for other site. However, I believe, when websites are to be ranked according to genuine and substantial content (and the service it offers to navigators), these would probably fails to achieve popularity, contrary to those who do otherwise. Indeed, in this concept, yours is the credit.

Nice reading your blog. Just continue doing things that you believe much better and ideal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day!</p>
<p>The information posted in your blog about the traffic enjoyed by several websites (not because of the quality of their articles published but because there remarkable traffic hits are just a product of being anchored to giant search engines) is not new to my analysis of the trend of generating website traffic. I have thought that before. And now, I have proven that I am not alone that is aware of this fact- your vigilance (thru your blogs) supplements my idea that it is really possible to drive website traffic without so much effort (as what you&#8217;ve said) on building quality-centered articles. Though, I am not that knowledgeable to visualize how did you conceptualize and eventually found a strategic analysis in tracking the performance of these websites (based on traffic hits), I am still convinced on the emergence of this fact.    </p>
<p>Well, it is significant to note, however, that all around in the net are for business. We must not disclose this reality. We must be aware that the primary goal of these website is just &#8216; how to make money&#8217; without enough effort (ideal article writing). We are aware that in business, everyone, as much as possible, thinks how to maximize profit within the scope of reasonable cost (Maximization of profit, minimization of cost).</p>
<p>And though, this kind of trend continues to soar in the cyber world ( where significant traffic is accumulated by keywords and terms) I think, it is unreasonable for you to be threatened by this (if that is what you feel) because you have said (In the idea of beating the established site on keywords and terms): Yes you can, as a part of the research I did, I posted new articles to match those keywords and though I landed on page 1 of search engines, it took me at least 3-4 days before I could rank higher than them. See? You were able to make your site on the higher rank. Therefore, you are in the right track on how to drive website traffic in the most ideal way that every site should exercise. There is no significant reason to be worried about. As long as your site is making you and your company grows with the system you are in, then this exercise must be continued.</p>
<p>I think we can not claim that the common practices of these websites are illegal or something that can cause problem for other site. However, I believe, when websites are to be ranked according to genuine and substantial content (and the service it offers to navigators), these would probably fails to achieve popularity, contrary to those who do otherwise. Indeed, in this concept, yours is the credit.</p>
<p>Nice reading your blog. Just continue doing things that you believe much better and ideal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
