Comments on: New Features and Screenshots In Office 2010 http://techie-buzz.com/featured/microsoft-office-2010-features.html Know your technology head on Sun, 20 May 2012 14:16:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: m_jhon2003http://techie-buzz.com/featured/microsoft-office-2010-features.html/comment-page-1#comment-145525 m_jhon2003 Sun, 29 Aug 2010 04:34:19 +0000 http://techie-buzz.com/featured/microsoft-office-2010-features.html#comment-145525 Unversed gota know this is all about marketing--the more fool you can make, the more money you can make. Unversed gota know this is all about marketing–the more fool you can make, the more money you can make.

]]> By: boehttp://techie-buzz.com/featured/microsoft-office-2010-features.html/comment-page-1#comment-46572 boe Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:50:13 +0000 http://techie-buzz.com/featured/microsoft-office-2010-features.html#comment-46572 Nothing beneficial for most businesses - no reason to upgrade/purchase -Like Vista - all bling - no function.If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have - 1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.2. Full OLE support for pictures in access - umm wasn't that functional with Office XP - why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don't want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I'm one person and most of my clients don't like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon. Nothing beneficial for most businesses – no reason to upgrade/purchase –

Like Vista – all bling – no function.

If they wanted to improve Office they SHOULD have -
1. Made outlook open multiple e-mail accounts as full exchange -not an additional mailbox with some functionality or pop/imap with very limited functionality but two seperate exchange profiles simultaneously from multiple exchange servers.

2. Full OLE support for pictures in access – umm wasn’t that functional with Office XP – why take that out? Why should someone have to code to add pictures to a personal database? Might was well use oracle or a real database if you are going to have to use code. Adding Office XP photo editor is the work around but why not just add photo editor back into office if that is the solution?

3. Offer the old menu bar for people (most of my clients) who don’t want to learn the new menu bar. You can finally modify the ribbon to some extent in 2010 however my clients just want their old ribbon bar. Frankly I have no issue with the new menu bar but I’m one person and most of my clients don’t like it so prefer to stick with office 2003. MS could make money selling the new version if they just offered the old menu as a choice with the new ribbon.

]]>