<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google SearchWiki: Digg Like Voting for Search Results, StumbleUpon Like Sharing and Comments [Exclusive Screenshots]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html?utm_source=subscriber&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:43:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
		<item>
		<title>By: 6 Reasons Why SearchWiki was launched and it&#8217;s mistakes &#124; SocialMediaFish</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-35351</link>
		<dc:creator>6 Reasons Why SearchWiki was launched and it&#8217;s mistakes &#124; SocialMediaFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-35351</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t know if you guys remember but Google wanted to buy Digg, the cost? Around 200 million. They ended up saying No Deal but Google has now implemented SearchWiki which is best described as a &#8216;digg-like&#8217; feature. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t know if you guys remember but Google wanted to buy Digg, the cost? Around 200 million. They ended up saying No Deal but Google has now implemented SearchWiki which is best described as a &#8216;digg-like&#8217; feature. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 Reasons Why SearchWiki was launched and it&#8217;s mistakes &#124; On.eTi.me</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-31321</link>
		<dc:creator>6 Reasons Why SearchWiki was launched and it&#8217;s mistakes &#124; On.eTi.me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-31321</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t know if you guys remember but Google wanted to buy Digg, the cost? Around 200 million. They ended up saying No Deal but Google has now implemented SearchWiki which is best described as a &#8216;digg-like&#8217; feature. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t know if you guys remember but Google wanted to buy Digg, the cost? Around 200 million. They ended up saying No Deal but Google has now implemented SearchWiki which is best described as a &#8216;digg-like&#8217; feature. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thai Brothers&#8217; Sharing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google SearchWiki</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-30324</link>
		<dc:creator>Thai Brothers&#8217; Sharing Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google SearchWiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-30324</guid>
		<description>[...] Screenshot courtesy of Keith Dsouza. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Screenshot courtesy of Keith Dsouza. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narayanan Hariharan</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-30240</link>
		<dc:creator>Narayanan Hariharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/google-searchwiki-digg-like-voting-for-search-results-stumbleupon-like-sharing-and-comments-exclusive-screenshots.html#comment-30240</guid>
		<description>I hope this voting doesn&#039;t affect search results. 

If search results are based on this, then after some time Google will go on a banning spree just like Digg and Stumble Upon did recently!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this voting doesn&#8217;t affect search results. </p>
<p>If search results are based on this, then after some time Google will go on a banning spree just like Digg and Stumble Upon did recently!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
