Google Chrome Extensions vs Firefox Add-ons: Head to Head Comparison

It has almost been a week now since Google went live with , and barely over a year since itself was introduced. On the other hand, Firefox has been around for 5 years now and there are tons of which are much more than useful.

chrome_extensions_vs_firefox_addons

So are Chrome Extensions better than Firefox add-ons? Well, lets take a look at some Head to Head comparison to get an idea. I must make a note that Firefox without add-ons is just another browser, and most of its popularity is because of the add-ons. Google Chrome on the other hand is much more faster, however it still lacks several useful extensions, which is why many users are not yet switching to Chrome.

Don’t Miss: Best and Most Useful Google Chrome Extensions

Round 1: Ease of Installation

The one thing I like about Chrome extensions and themes in general is the ability to install and uninstall Chrome extensions without restarting the browser. On the other hand, Firefox needs to be restarted every time you install an extension or theme. Firefox has made some headway in the form of Personas, however the promised introduction of restartless add-ons and theme installation is nowhere to be seen in Firefox 3.6.

Winner: Google Chrome

Round 2: Browser Performance with Extensions/Add-ons

Since the introduction of Google Chrome extensions, many users were skeptical whether installing extensions would slow down the browser or create an impact on its performance. Let’s just say that nothing of that sort will happen, Chrome runs extensions and tabs in separate processes, so no one extension can affect the entire browser. This is a technology which has made Chrome faster than other browsers and much more manageable.

On the other hand, Firefox is known to crawl if you install too many extensions. This may not be due to the browser itself, but try installing 10-15 add-ons and opening 10 tabs, you will notice high memory usage and a significant snag in Firefox performance.

Winner: Google Chrome

12 thoughts on “Google Chrome Extensions vs Firefox Add-ons: Head to Head Comparison”

  1. Hate to admit it, but at its current rate of progress, Chrome will run all over Firefox in 2-3 years' time. Firefox has really got to step it up and come up with some new and innovative ideas. In my opinion, switching to web-kit could be a huge boost for FF but the Mozilla team doesn't seem kin on doing that.

    1. @Ashutosh – I believe that it would happen far more sooner than 2-3 years. Firefox is just concentrating on design, whereas features such as separate processes for tabs and restartless extension installation is no where to be seen. And to top it Firefox is a memory hogger.

      1. Yeah right! Firefox's development pace was much faster than that of Internet Explorer. And now Chrome is developing much faster than Firefox. So in a way, Chrome is the new Firefox and Firefox is the new IE. :]

    2. Chrome already had the use cases ready, so they took that best from all the browsers and along with the powerful marketing of google (you can see chrome link at the google homepage), no wonder you can do something better which has already been done, same with MS, it has been doing the same thing with Apple for years.

  2. As far as extensions are concerned, the Google equivalents for Firefox's AdblockPlus and FireGestures addons have much need of being revamped. Two top extensions that i believe any serious user needs.
    Firefox wins.

    With Cleo addon you can backup/restore all your extensions/themes in one click plus one restart.
    Firefox wins.

    Many other compatible addons Firefox may not make it in for Chrome in a while yet (perhaps a year or two). Diigo, Care2, Cybersearch, Feedly, WOT, DownloadThemAll, SlimSearch and how many other all time favs?
    Firefox wins again (for now).

    Beyond this though (and other things that others may want to add on), competition will be tight for Firefox (and Opera, and Maxthon3!).

    Question is. Will it bring in more users from IE or just those who are in the know?

    1. @Daniel – I agree with you on several counts, and as you can see, whatever you said I agreed very well in the Round 3 and picked Firefox as the winner.

      Chrome extensions just went mainstream a week away so you can expect lots of improvements over the next few months.

      Also Feedly is available for Chrome and like I said in Round 6 many more extensions will be ported to Chrome and will improve over time.

  3. Opera was my favorite browser (light, tabs, resume sessions,…etc.) until Firefox started catching up & offering those features & more. Chrome is now doing the same thing. It's just an endless process.!!!!

    I'm just wondering if there will ever be a limit on performance & extensions at which all browsers will end up the same…..?!?!

  4. Google chrome’s extensions don’t slow down the browser because chrome’s extension interface is very basic. It’s like writing a program in C and offering to link with a plugin. Firefox’s plugin system is more complex and flexible, hence the extreme lag.
    Chrome’s extensions are ok-ish, but I can’t see how it’s better than firefox in security. Chrome has nothing remotely intricate like XPConnect wrappers, which allows the extensions to safely modify the page.

  5. RE: Ashutosh Mishra on December 13th, 2009:

    Hate to admit it, but at its current rate of progress, Chrome will run all over Firefox in 2-3 years’ time.

    Okay guys, its been 2 years since Mirsha wrote this, I am a loyal firefox user who is tired of how SLOW firefox is. DOES CHROME have as many add-ons/extensions as Firefox now? Is it better? Time for an updated article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>