<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail for Mobile 2.0 Rocks, It&#8217;s Sleeker and Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html?utm_source=subscriber&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:43:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Gmail For Mobile Gets Labels Support</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html#comment-35444</link>
		<dc:creator>Gmail For Mobile Gets Labels Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html#comment-35444</guid>
		<description>[...] sometime back we had covered the Gmail for Mobiles application which was much more faster and sleeker than it’s predecessor, including several new features and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sometime back we had covered the Gmail for Mobiles application which was much more faster and sleeker than it’s predecessor, including several new features and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Android Arrives Alliteratively &#124; NUrdRadio</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html#comment-30128</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Arrives Alliteratively &#124; NUrdRadio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html#comment-30128</guid>
		<description>[...] http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html" rel="nofollow">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparx</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html#comment-30026</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/gmail-for-mobile-20-rocks-its-sleeker-and-faster.html#comment-30026</guid>
		<description>There are reports that claim this newer version, while slicker looking also consumes more bandwidth than the older 1.5 version.

Any way to corroborate this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are reports that claim this newer version, while slicker looking also consumes more bandwidth than the older 1.5 version.</p>
<p>Any way to corroborate this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
