<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing Goes 1 Up on Google Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:23:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scot Colford</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html#comment-40031</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Colford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html#comment-40031</guid>
		<description>@Keith Yeah, I just had a total smackdown today. Need a copy of the clean install for Movable Type 2.63 from 2003. I search Google for the file name &quot;MT-2.63.tar.gz&quot; and I get several (albeit fruitless) links. I search Bing? Nada nada limonada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keith Yeah, I just had a total smackdown today. Need a copy of the clean install for Movable Type 2.63 from 2003. I search Google for the file name &#8220;MT-2.63.tar.gz&#8221; and I get several (albeit fruitless) links. I search Bing? Nada nada limonada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dsouza</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html#comment-40029</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dsouza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html#comment-40029</guid>
		<description>@Scot I agree, I was just pointing out the fact that they gained around 1% of market share in US from Google, and like you I rely more on Google and seldom use Bing for searching content</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scot I agree, I was just pointing out the fact that they gained around 1% of market share in US from Google, and like you I rely more on Google and seldom use Bing for searching content</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Colford</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html#comment-40028</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Colford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/bing-gains-market-share-from-google-july-2009.html#comment-40028</guid>
		<description>Oh, please. Bing does some neat sifting, but Google has unequivocally better recall, meaning it brings back all the fish in the sea. My argument rests there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please. Bing does some neat sifting, but Google has unequivocally better recall, meaning it brings back all the fish in the sea. My argument rests there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
