<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6.5 Million Lists Created on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/featured/6-5-million-lists-created-on-twitter.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/6-5-million-lists-created-on-twitter.html</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:57:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dsouza</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/6-5-million-lists-created-on-twitter.html#comment-46392</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dsouza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/6-5-million-lists-created-on-twitter.html#comment-46392</guid>
		<description>@Marshall I agree, maybe Google pruned some results or they just became private lists. However, unless Twitter comes up with some numbers it is all speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marshall I agree, maybe Google pruned some results or they just became private lists. However, unless Twitter comes up with some numbers it is all speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/featured/6-5-million-lists-created-on-twitter.html#comment-46391</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/featured/6-5-million-lists-created-on-twitter.html#comment-46391</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, that looks like a pretty unreliable method.  After the weekend, that number is down to 4.5m :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, that looks like a pretty unreliable method.  After the weekend, that number is down to 4.5m <img src='http://techie-buzz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
