<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offline Gmail Access With Geemail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techie-buzz.com/adobe-air/offline-gmail-access-with-geemail.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techie-buzz.com/adobe-air/offline-gmail-access-with-geemail.html?utm_source=subscriber&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Know your technology head on</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:50:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Akses Akun Gmail Anda dengan GeeMail &#124; patembe dot com</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/adobe-air/offline-gmail-access-with-geemail.html#comment-33423</link>
		<dc:creator>Akses Akun Gmail Anda dengan GeeMail &#124; patembe dot com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/adobe-air/offline-gmail-access-with-geemail.html#comment-33423</guid>
		<description>[...] Download GeeMail &#124; via Techie Buzz [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Download GeeMail | via Techie Buzz [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goran Web</title>
		<link>http://techie-buzz.com/adobe-air/offline-gmail-access-with-geemail.html#comment-33243</link>
		<dc:creator>Goran Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techie-buzz.com/adobe-air/offline-gmail-access-with-geemail.html#comment-33243</guid>
		<description>Adobe always have solid solutions, and there is no reason why this one shouldn&#039;t be too. I for one would rather not give Google too much power, and will rather use an app from Adobe to give me the offline functionality that I crave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe always have solid solutions, and there is no reason why this one shouldn&#8217;t be too. I for one would rather not give Google too much power, and will rather use an app from Adobe to give me the offline functionality that I crave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
